Re: [boost] Logo substance.

From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-22 22:51:00

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:32:56 +1100, Matt Hurd <matt.hurd_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> IOn Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:53:03 -0500, Jonathan Brandmeyer
> 
> 
> <jbrandmeyer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 16:06 -0600, Rene Rivera wrote:
> >
> > > True, but it will likely be easier to decide on the substance of the
> > > logo without the text. No distractions that way. Not that one should
> > > forget totally about the text. But it's much easier to think about what
> > > can represent Boost, without the word Boost in it.
> > >
> > > So far I see three different concepts for logo:
> > >
> > > 1) The "<>" brackets.
> > >
> > > 2) The "++" operator.
> > >
> > > 3) The rocket.
> > >
> > > Perhaps discussing what the logo substance is before getting to deep
> > > into the design is best?
> 
> I like the concept but not the logo... here is a take on the same
> concept without the explicit rocket image and an emphasis on the Open
> Source part of <c++ boOSt>
> 
> See, you can just type the logo too :-)
> 
> matt.
> happy user of <c++ boOSt>

Please no.  Yuck.

-- 
Caleb Epstein
caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com