[boost] Re: [Review] Named parameter questions

From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-23 14:45:36

Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 03:33 AM 11/23/2004, Daniel Wallin wrote:
> 
>  >> Is there a way for the user of the library to enforce a rule like "No
>  >> positional param after named params" on a case by case basis?
>  >
>  >I think we could implement something like that. I have to think about it
>  >a little.
> 
> It may be confusing to users if different uses of the library follow 
> different rules. Is there a serious need for anything other than the 
> conservative "No positional param after named params" rule? (That's the 
> rule I'm used to.)

No the rule is fine, I just meant I needed to think about if we could
enforce it easily at compile time and I think we can.

-- 
Daniel Wallin