[boost] Re: Interesting Boost Implementation Details?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-07 17:56:00

Christopher D. Russell wrote:
> My reasoning was that the BGL does leverage the concept library in its 
> implementation, and this technique seems like a reasonable way to structure 
> complex C++ libraries that might be usefully applied by your audience in 
> their own projects. My suggestion of a brief survey / mention of the BGL was 
> only to provide some context for discussion of this technique. Not to suggest 
> that you survey it's API, usage modes, etc. But perhaps you're right and my 
> suggestion is not appropriate.

Well, concept checking *is* something that even advanced C++ programmers
could stand to do more of.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com