RE: [boost] Boost Profiler Proposal

From: Brian Braatz (brianb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-07 12:00:35

Yes. I would use this library. Though, personally, I would like a
greater scope of what it does.

The details of other things I would like to see from this library or a
companion library are here:

http://tinyurl.com/5sbyx

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
> On Behalf Of christopher diggins
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 7:38 AM
> To: Boost mailing list
> Subject: [boost] Boost Profiler Proposal
> 
> I have updated the Profiler (and done some testing using Visual C++,
7.1)
> at
> http://www.cdiggins.com/profiler/ . I have mostly decided to freeze
the
> features for the profiler mini-library as described and posted at
> http://www.cdiggins.com/profiler/ . My question to the group is: would
you
> use this library as it is? If you don't want to mail the group, I
would
> appreciate even just a quick note: yes, no, maybe.
> 
> If anyone has a POSIX high-resolution timer modeled on the Boost.Timer
> concept to share, it would be greatly appreciated! I would also
appreciate
> new profiling policies, to include as examples.
> 
> PS: this profiling tool seems to be a natural fit for the Boost.Test
> macros
> like BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW, I currently use something like:
> 
>     BOOST_PROFILE_AND_CHECK_NO_THROW(TKN)
> BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW(BOOST_PROFILE(TKN))
> 
> Christopher Diggins
> Object Oriented Template Library (OOTL)
> http://www.ootl.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost