From: Jonathan Wakely (cow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-19 09:10:39
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> BTW, vim warned me saying that the files I changed in the patch do not
> have a newline at the end. It added one automatically, but I've
> removed that chunk from the patch. Is this behavior expected? IMHO,
> the newline should be there (otherwise, cat <file> looks ugly).
I think that is expected, yes. Vim always adds newlines to text files,
because as you say, it's usually the right thing to do.
I think if you start vim in binary mode (vim -b) then it doesn't add a
Hope that helps,
-- "Burn the b'st'rds" - The JAMs
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk