[boost] Re: Type of Review for UnorderedAssociativeContainers&HashFunctions

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-26 19:41:19

"Daniel James" <daniel_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:cvq8hm$cbj$2_at_sea.gmane.org...
| Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
| > I think tr components should be allowed special status. What's the point 
in
| > putting tr components through a normal review, when there can be no 
interface
| > changes?
| >
| > If the definition of fast-track review is not suitable for tr components, 
then
| > let us call it a
| > tr review. The important aspect of such a review is that it should be 
fast.
|
| Fast as in soon? Or just spending less time on the review?

the latter.

| I don't mind
| waiting in the review queue so unless anyone really wants to see this in
| Boost as soon as possible, I guess that Boost.Hash should be fast
| tracked, Boost.Unordered should go in the queue, maybe for a shorter
| than normal review. Is that okay with everyone?

again, what is the difference---in time-- between a fast-track review and
a review that is "a shorter than normal review" ???

-Thorsten