[boost] Re: Logo 67 bad [was: Logo comments]

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-08 23:53:59

David Abrahams wrote:
> "Jonathan Turkanis" writes:
>> David Abrahams wrote:

>>> I consider that a background pattern and not sacrosanct.  I never
>>> would have noticed it had you not pointed it out.
>>>
>>> I think if we had to eliminate any abstract graphic that was used in
>>> promotional or packaging material, there'd be hardly anything we
>>> could use.
>>
>> If it was used on the packaging of baby formula I might agree with
>> you. Having a logo that's so similar to to VC++ marketing material
>> would be a real problem, IMO.
>
> Even though it's just a minor design element in the VC++ package?

I never noticed it before, because I throw software boxes out and stash the
contents in binders. However, looking at the box, the motif seems fairly
prominent.

Jonathan