From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-09 20:24:27
"Reid Sweatman" <drunkardswalk_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> "Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > IMO, option 67 should be removed.
>> I consider that a background pattern and not sacrosanct. I
>> never would have noticed it had you not pointed it out.
>> I think if we had to eliminate any abstract graphic that was used
>> in promotional or packaging material, there'd be hardly anything we
>> could use.
> True, but MS is notoriously litigious, and, well, I assume you know
> of the case where IBM sued someone for doing a logo in block blue
> letters? Won too (big surprise). Some years ago.
Yeah, I've been convinced it's a problem since at least yesterday. :(
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk