From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-20 15:53:14
Andreas Huber wrote:
> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>> Andreas Huber wrote:
>>> That's interesting. I was under the impression that exactly such a
>>> list of alternate implementation techniques would not satisfy you,
>>> because it would in no way show that the design I chose is the best
>> Why not? That would be the main point.
> I don't understand. A list of alternate techniques would show that
> none of these techniques satisfies the requirements but it doesn't say
> anything why the current FSM implementation performs worse than any of
> these techniques.
You don't just list the techniques. You explain them and summarize their
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk