Re: [boost] Re: Regression report for Releases?

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-20 16:17:54

Jeff Garland wrote:

> [...]  We've also had several previous discussions on other
> things that are pushing up the need for additional resources
> including: Boost is just plain getting bigger, need for non-debug
> regression tests, double testing for dll non-dll versions of linked
> libs, etc.

With/without thread support, too.