Re: [boost] Re: Re: Classpath to C++ conversion

From: Kon Lovett (klovett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-31 09:06:28

Uh, then maybe automated translation. (Only know of one translator: 
http://www.remotesoft.com/octopus but it is commercial & .NET 
oriented.)

Any Java core class libraries w/o license issues?

Kon

On Mar 31, 2005, at 4:42 AM, Pavel Vozenilek wrote:

>
> "Tushar" wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> For now, forget about classpath and gcj. These are implementation
>> issues. This is all about having a java api implemented in C++. I want
>> to know how much people thinks this can be good thing to do.
>>
> A system that would allow to reuse Java sources without
> much of pain would be Good Thing (TM).
>
> /Pavel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>