From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-27 16:11:31
"Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "Rogier van Dalen" <rogiervd_at_[hidden]> wrote
>> I find installing Boost is pretty easy; but as long as one hasn't
>> tried it yet, Boost may look scarily big.
> There has been talk before
>> on something like "Boost Light". Combining concerns #1 and #2,
>> wouldn't it be a good idea to supply a small subset of boost
>> consisting of header-only libraries only?
> I would have thought a system such as r.p.m / windows installer could be used.
> Is the requirement not just a remote version of the functionality of bcp ?. Tie
> this in to the http://www.boost.org/libs/libraries.htm with a suitable
> installer and it would certainly attract casual users.
It would be nice to be able to download and install just the parts you
need, on the fly. I think that would make people feel a whole lot
> Perhaps this represents dumbing down ?
You say that like it's a bad thing(?)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk