From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-05 05:51:18
"David Sankel" wrote:
Thanks for your review, first.
> However, I cannot see any wide-spread use for the multiton library.
> While an interesting idea, the mutiton would be better implemented as
> a map<string,object> for runtime or just shared variables at
> compile-time. These options are more flexible from the get-go.
Purpose of multiton is to hide such infrastructure from the user.
Above mentioned techniques are still available for specific needs.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk