From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-05 12:04:07
Stefan Strasser wrote:
> I don't vote because I have not (yet) looked at the library itself,
> but from the review replies so far I'd like to moot that it may be
> too early to include a singleton library which:
> - is not MT safe
> - is not tested with shared libraries
> - seems not to be tested with many compilers(...several newer
The third point is no big deal. A lot of porting often occurs after acceptance.
I agree that MT support is crucial, and that shared library support is very
important, if i is possible. Rather than reject the library because these
problems haven't been addressed, let's try to address them during the review.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk