From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-17 14:43:58
Dave Harris wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <20050516205339.GW11789_at_[hidden]>
> droba_at_[hidden] (Pavol Droba) wrote (abridged):
>> In addition I would suggest to remove direct support for pointer
>> types like char* from the range library and provide it only via
>> as_string() construct to definitely remove any kind of confusion.
> Sounds like a good idea.
> Are we going to generalise it to allow any (compile-time constant)
> terminator? If so, is as_string() the best name?
Why does the terminator have to be a compile-time constant?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk