Re: [boost] Re: Re: [iostreams] example_test and newline_testloop ongcc-3_3-darwin

From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-19 02:21:50

Jonathan Turkanis wrote:

> I'm now testing the hypothesis that the problem is std::rand behaving badly on
> these platforms. I've switched to Boost.Random, and have left just one of the
> problem tests, newline_test.cpp, uncommented.

newline_test passes now (intel 8.1/Linux) taking only 1.2 seconds here
when I run it manually.

Regards,
m