From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-19 02:21:50
Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
> I'm now testing the hypothesis that the problem is std::rand behaving badly on
> these platforms. I've switched to Boost.Random, and have left just one of the
> problem tests, newline_test.cpp, uncommented.
newline_test passes now (intel 8.1/Linux) taking only 1.2 seconds here
when I run it manually.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk