From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve (rwgk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-16 15:44:30
--- Markus Schöpflin <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
> > I am using Boost.Python all the time under Tru64 with cxx 6.5, and have
> > been doing so for many years. I guess there must be a difference in how
> > we compile. I am not using bjam but a SCons-based build system. The
> > result of building with the Boost CVS from earlier this morning,
> > including the cxx commands, is here:
> > All our regression tests (many) passed.
> Do you use the patched header file for <iotraits> when compiling
> boost.python? Because I just tried compiling with different options and now
> I got bitten by the missing support for std::fpos_t.
I don't think so. I am using the Boost tree as I get it with cvs update.
If you want to find out exactly what I am doing go to
and copy the source bundle including Python into a new empty directory on your
Tru64 machine. Then simply run
and watch the cxx commands fly by.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk