Boost logo

Boost :

From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve (rwgk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-16 15:44:30

--- Markus Schöpflin <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
> > I am using Boost.Python all the time under Tru64 with cxx 6.5, and have
> > been doing so for many years. I guess there must be a difference in how
> > we compile. I am not using bjam but a SCons-based build system. The
> > result of building with the Boost CVS from earlier this morning,
> > including the cxx commands, is here:
> >
> >
> >
> > All our regression tests (many) passed.
> Do you use the patched header file for <iotraits> when compiling
> boost.python? Because I just tried compiling with different options and now
> I got bitten by the missing support for std::fpos_t.

I don't think so. I am using the Boost tree as I get it with cvs update.

If you want to find out exactly what I am doing go to

and copy the source bundle including Python into a new empty directory on your
Tru64 machine. Then simply run

    perl cctbx_python_241_bundle.selfx

and watch the cxx commands fly by.


Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at