Re: [boost] [function types] Formal Review begins today.

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-18 14:42:14

"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote

> Ah - thanks! We'll want to use this instead of function_type_arity, so default
> arguments work. Adding an assertion that the arity of the function is greater 
> or
> equal to the number of elements in the tuple would be nice.

Unfortunately because its a pointer to a function it wont handle the default 
args, at least not in my test above.
(OTOH this sounds reasonably sensible)

Need to swap equal_to with greater_equal in  attached to try this.

regards
Andy Little