|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-11 16:31:01
Rob Stewart <stewart_at_[hidden]> writes:
> From: Ulrich Eckhardt <uli_at_[hidden]>
>>
>> MSC_VER <= 1200 -> MSC_VER < 1300
>> MSC_VER > 1200 -> MSC_VER >= 1300
>> MSC_VER == 1200 -> MSC_VER < 1300
>
> I have no idea if this is important, but the last one clearly
> stands out. Is it intentional that all versions less than 1300
> should match for those previous cases in which exactly version
> 1200 was to match?
We never supported versions before 1200, so that's really equivalent
as far as Boost is concerned.
> IOW, should the last case be the following?
>
> _MSC_VER >= 1200 && _MSC_VER < 1300
>
> As I typed that, I recall having read that "MSC_VER" was supposed
> to have been "_MSC_VER." Did you miss that in your patch?
heh, I pointed it out too, but nobody heard ;-)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk