Boost logo

Boost :

From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-11 16:00:37


From: Ulrich Eckhardt <uli_at_[hidden]>
>
> MSC_VER <= 1200 -> MSC_VER < 1300
> MSC_VER > 1200 -> MSC_VER >= 1300
> MSC_VER == 1200 -> MSC_VER < 1300

I have no idea if this is important, but the last one clearly
stands out. Is it intentional that all versions less than 1300
should match for those previous cases in which exactly version
1200 was to match? IOW, should the last case be the following?

   _MSC_VER >= 1200 && _MSC_VER < 1300

As I typed that, I recall having read that "MSC_VER" was supposed
to have been "_MSC_VER." Did you miss that in your patch?

-- 
Rob Stewart                           stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     http://www.sig.com
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk