Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-13 04:34:27

Next message: Jonathan Wakely: "Re: [boost] [iostreams] please vote on template names"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Reference to SF tracker is important"
Next in thread: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] [Range] terminology"
Reply: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] [Range] terminology"

I note that http://www.boost.org/libs/range/doc/range.html uses the
term "closed-open range." The term used in prior art is "half-open
range." Is there a good reason to invent new terminology here?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Jonathan Wakely: "Re: [boost] [iostreams] please vote on template names"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Reference to SF tracker is important"
Next in thread: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] [Range] terminology"
Reply: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] [Range] terminology"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk