Re: [boost] [Range] terminology

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-13 10:52:58

Hi Dave,

David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:

> I note that http://www.boost.org/libs/range/doc/range.html uses the
> term "closed-open range."  The term used in prior art is "half-open
> range."  Is there a good reason to invent new terminology here?
 

For some reason my replies don't get to the list yet.
So I'll post using the web-interface.

To answer the question: otherwise, how do you now which end that is open and 
which that is closed?

-Thorsten