From: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-26 11:38:05
David Abrahams ha escrito:
> Cromwell Enage <sponage_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > --- David Abrahams wrote:
> >> Which categories should it go in?
> > Try "Containers" and/or "Miscellaneous".
> How does it fit in "containers?"
> I'd vote for "Generic Programming"
I fail to see what Boost.Parameter has to do with generic
> and "Miscellaneous." I think we
> should have a "Functional Programming" category and it should go in
> there, too.
Again, I don't see how the lib is related to functional programming.
To me, Boost.Parameter sports a special kind of syntactic sugar, so
I'd add an "Idioms" (or something like that) category grouping:
- perhaps, compressed_pair
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
> We have more components designed to operate on functions
> and function objects every day.
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Consulting
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk