From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-31 10:49:29
On Aug 31, 2005, at 9:33 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> I did try this, without success. Also, note that only few files in
>>> have watches on them, so this should not matter either.
>>> But, I recall there were plans to switch to Subversion, which does
>>> have such problems (in addition to being vastly better that CVS in
>>> respect). What happened to those plans?
>> Definitely on hold until after 1.33.1
> Do you mean that the switch won't happen until then, or that no work
> will be
> done until then. Some things like installing server are rather
> If that done, given that CVS->SVN was successfully done in past,
> switch will
> require just a day to convert current state and load it into the
I think I somehow ended up as the person to handle the switchover,
which means that *nothing* will happen until after 1.33.1 because I'm
way too overloaded.
What needs to happen? Several things:
- Decide how to layout the SVN repository
- Decide if we should use the fine-grained access controls Subversion
allows, and who gets what kind of access
- Decide if we should jettison some old junk (long-dead branches,
etc.) from CVS, and what that junk is
- Update the various web pages and HOWTOs to reference Subversion,
tools such as TortoiseSVN, etc.
OSL is willing to host the Boost Subversion repository. We already have
a Subversion server for all of our internal projects and all of the
computing power and bandwidth that we would need.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk