From: Pavel Vozenilek (pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-07 02:07:43
"Scott Schurr" wrote:
> On a different note, Matt Calabrese lofted a
> preprocessor-based library:
> BOOST_BINARY_LITERAL( 101 0111 1010 0110 )
> This looks way cool. I personally like the way the '::value'
> is not required.
> So, how does the boost community decide which of the proposals
> (template-based or preprocessor-based) to pursue?
During review reviewers tell their opinion.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk