Re: [boost] Boost.Signals and Qt

From: Martin Bonner (martin.bonner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-23 04:38:31

----Original Message----
From: Simon Buchan [mailto:simon_at_[hidden]]
Sent: 23 September 2005 09:40
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Signals and Qt

> Vladimir Prus wrote:

>> ? Do you mean that the current situation is optimal, and any
>> attempts on improving it are just wasting time?
>> 
>> - Volodya
>> 
> Are you serious? You're writing a library! You think someone might use
> it with Qt! Yes, dumbass, you SHOULD do that! Take a look at some of
> the boost headers (esp. functional, lambda, bind) and THEN bitch
> about how hard it is to write a library.
> If it hurts your poor fingers (or eyes), put this somewhere useful
> (ie. detail namespace):
> namespace whatever = ::boost::BOOST_SIGNALS_NAMESPACE;

Are *you* serious?  Volodya ask if you think the current situation is
optimal, and you insult him.

I don't see how you post adds to the discussion.

-- 
Martin Bonner
Martin.Bonner_at_[hidden]
Pi Technology, Milton Hall, Ely Road, Milton, Cambridge, CB4 6WZ,
ENGLAND Tel: [phone]