From: Martin Bonner (martin.bonner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-23 04:38:31
From: Simon Buchan [mailto:simon_at_[hidden]]
Sent: 23 September 2005 09:40
Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Signals and Qt
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> ? Do you mean that the current situation is optimal, and any
>> attempts on improving it are just wasting time?
>> - Volodya
> Are you serious? You're writing a library! You think someone might use
> it with Qt! Yes, dumbass, you SHOULD do that! Take a look at some of
> the boost headers (esp. functional, lambda, bind) and THEN bitch
> about how hard it is to write a library.
> If it hurts your poor fingers (or eyes), put this somewhere useful
> (ie. detail namespace):
> namespace whatever = ::boost::BOOST_SIGNALS_NAMESPACE;
Are *you* serious? Volodya ask if you think the current situation is
optimal, and you insult him.
I don't see how you post adds to the discussion.
-- Martin Bonner Martin.Bonner_at_[hidden] Pi Technology, Milton Hall, Ely Road, Milton, Cambridge, CB4 6WZ, ENGLAND Tel: +44 (0)1223 441434
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk