From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-23 14:15:53
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> So, there was a really interesting and hot discussion about namings.
> Many opinions were expressed and I'd like to make some roundup.
I still think that the question "should X be included at all" is slightly
more fundamental than "should X be named rearm, protect, or on". But this
may be just me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk