From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-29 09:55:20
Andy Little wrote:
> "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote
>> Failing that, anybody has any killer idea for GUI development that
>> warrants new library? Why don't add Qt to the C++ standard?
That's not really relevant in two areas:
1. For open-source applications, there's GPL version, costing exactly $0
2. Do you really want to write a new GUI library just to help commercial
That's price of Qt *library*, for commercial use.
- Standard specifies only interface, and does not mandate specific source
code or vendor.
- Why do you think any implementation of standard library should be free of
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk