From: Jose (jmalv04_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-18 06:10:30
On 10/18/05, Arkadiy Vertleyb <vertleyb_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> "Jose" <jmalv04_at_[hidden]> wrote
> > With these results we can compare both queries and although the string
> > from the cities my differ the numerical values should not.
> Well, this may make more sence (depending on what you want to find out).
> However, this is a much simpler query -- just sort on the sity, groupby,
> then re-sort on the counter -- I am sure both libraries will be efficient
I realized the modified query might give more meaningful output but I didn't
realize that it was much simpler query
Also I don't think one can specify (lat, lon) for a city.
what i was suggesting is consider each (lat, long) as a city but the actual
string name for the city might not be meaningful b/c the data doesn't map
always the same (lat,lon) to the same string
I would finish with the original example before we proceed to anything else.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk