From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-29 09:51:08
On Oct 28, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> A lot of these failures are for gcc-2.95.3-linux. Do we care enough
> 2.95.3 nowadays to consider it a release platform?
I vageuely remember trying to kill GCC 2.95.3 support at one point,
but was convinced otherwise. We could just mark it as unusable on new
libraries/tests that support it but retain backward compatibility on
those libraries that do.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk