From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-29 11:24:53
Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Oct 28, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>> A lot of these failures are for gcc-2.95.3-linux. Do we care enough
>> 2.95.3 nowadays to consider it a release platform?
> I vageuely remember trying to kill GCC 2.95.3 support at one point,
> but was convinced otherwise. We could just mark it as unusable on new
> libraries/tests that support it but retain backward compatibility on
> those libraries that do.
If not "don't," how will we know we're retaining backward
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk