From: Reece Dunn (msclrhd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-07 16:29:13
Robert Ramey wrote:
> I had hoped that these improvements might be incorporated
> into the "official" version. I still hope that this or something
> like it can occur. Its not a huge issue for me as it has worked
> well for me as is but I think this "superset" of the original
> would be valuable to others.
With the discussion previously regarding bjam output, it might also be
worth considering adding support in bjam to output in XML, as well as
allowing the current TEXT output.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk