Re: [boost] compiler_status_2

From: Reece Dunn (msclrhd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-07 16:29:13

Robert Ramey wrote:
> I had hoped that these improvements might be incorporated
> into the "official" version.  I still hope that this or something
> like it can occur.  Its not a huge issue for me as it has worked
> well for me as is but I think this "superset" of the original
> would be valuable to others.

With the discussion previously regarding bjam output, it might also be 
worth considering adding support in bjam to output in XML, as well as 
allowing the current TEXT output.

- Reece