From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-20 10:50:24
> >>> First and foremost I would like to remind everybody that we
> already have
> >>> one library intended to cover this problem domain (completely
> >>> IMO - but that's another story). This library not only do not
> address issues
> >>> of existent solution it's not even comparatively close feature
> wise. ...
> >> Which existing library?
> > ? program options
> It is true that there is a small overlap with program-options, but the
> rest of the library (the majority of the library) doesn't have anything
> to do with Program Options AFAICT.
What is the basis for your opinion? IMO it's 1:1 correspondence.
Could you do feature by feature comparison?
> Also, but that needs to be confirmed, my impression was that
> for small jobs, Marcin's approach would be easier to apply, whereas
> Program Options is when you really need through solution.
It's matter of opinion. I agree PO could've been done much better. From
usability standpoint also.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk