From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-02 23:58:04
David Abrahams wrote:
> Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> The following libraries show fails across almost all platforms in the
>> 1.34 regression tests
>> I would be thankful for a short update on the reason and plans for
> As far as I can tell from
> the Python failures are all due to configuration problems on the part
> of the tester, or bugs in BBv2 -- they just have that smell about
Could you work with the testers to solve this issue?
But it's hard to tell much because the "fail" squares don't
> like through to any diagnostics ("Page not found!"). I'm surprised to
> see the asterix in many of these squares. What does that mean? It
> doesn't appear to be covered in the legend.
Not all of them seems like the asterix indicates missing links.
So here is a question for the test list. Where does the asterix come
from and how do we fix it?
Thanks in advance
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk