From: Reece Dunn (msclrhd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-15 18:48:41
Dave Abrahams wrote:
> What interface would you consider appropriate? Right now
> bjam ... define=_SECURE_SCL=0 ...
> works with BBv2. Do you want some kind of more descriptive syntax?
> bjam checked_iterators=no
> ?? That wouldn't be appropriate if _SECURE_SCL=0 has effects other
> than turning off iterator checking.
IIRC, using _SECURE_SCL means that VC8 will replace some calls to
strcpy, et. al. with the MS str***_s equivalents. There may be other
changes as well.
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk