Boost logo

Boost :

From: Reece Dunn (msclrhd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-15 18:48:41

Dave Abrahams wrote:
> What interface would you consider appropriate? Right now
> bjam ... define=_SECURE_SCL=0 ...
> works with BBv2. Do you want some kind of more descriptive syntax?
> bjam checked_iterators=no
> ?? That wouldn't be appropriate if _SECURE_SCL=0 has effects other
> than turning off iterator checking.

IIRC, using _SECURE_SCL means that VC8 will replace some calls to
strcpy, et. al. with the MS str***_s equivalents. There may be other
changes as well.

- Reece
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at