From: Alan Stokes (alan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-16 07:47:20
On 15/06/06, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Yuval Ronen <ronen_yuval_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > What's nonconformant about these checked iterators (apart from the
> > warnings, which are annoying, but not nonconformant)?
> They don't meet the complexity requirements (big-O) for iterators.
Isn't that true only in debug builds, not in release builds?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk