From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-05 19:44:33
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Emil Dotchevski
> > Well for some people the only way to fix a const correctness related
> > error is to remove the const. I can imagine people doing
> all sorts of
> > (wrong)casts. IMHO, I think the api should constrain that freedom
> > seeing as there *is* only one right way to do it!
> Please let's keep this to the point. There are no const_casts in the
> proposed Boost Exception library. If you think that the
> dynamic_cast can be
> avoided, I'm very much interested to hear how. If you think
> the need for
> dynamic_cast is a result of poor library design, I'm very
> much interested to
> hear about any improvement ideas.
You're missing my point. I didn't say that dynamic_cast in this way is
bad, nor did I say someone would use const_cast. I was only pointing out
that there are those who will just do what they can to get it to look
like it works.
Restrict those people.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk