From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-08 11:00:15
Peter Dimov wrote:
> The only reason for test_function_tricky.cpp to not compile with
> boost::function is the presence of the following two lines:
> long>, std::tr1::function<long (int)> >::value));
> char, double>, std::tr1::function<double (int,char)> >::value));
> that check for the (highly questionable and not particularly relevant)
> requrement that function<> should derive from unary_function or
> binary_function in some cases.
Questionable maybe, but none the less part of the TR1.
> I think that these two lines need to be moved to a separate test.
The only difference between this test and the "non-tricky" one is the
presence of those two lines. The test is intentionally pedantic.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk