Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-23 11:25:50

Next message: Christopher Eltschka: "Re: [boost] Interested? Simplify usage of std::rel_ops"
Previous message: Daryle Walker: "Re: [boost] Should we change the reply-to setting?"
In reply to: Gennaro Prota: "Re: [boost] Who wants Borland support?"
Next in thread: Gennaro Prota: "Re: [boost] Who wants Borland support?"
Reply: Gennaro Prota: "Re: [boost] Who wants Borland support?"

Gennaro Prota wrote:
> Furthermore, may I ask what does "STLport 5.1.0" without further
> qualifications mean? I have RC1 and usually I'm not even able to
> reproduce the error messages. Hope we are not testing against their
> CVS.

I don't know what it means for others, but for the tests I run "RSI
Droid2K V2" they are indeed from the STLport CVS. I'll put a note to
that effect on my info page :-)

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo

Next message: Christopher Eltschka: "Re: [boost] Interested? Simplify usage of std::rel_ops"
Previous message: Daryle Walker: "Re: [boost] Should we change the reply-to setting?"
In reply to: Gennaro Prota: "Re: [boost] Who wants Borland support?"
Next in thread: Gennaro Prota: "Re: [boost] Who wants Borland support?"
Reply: Gennaro Prota: "Re: [boost] Who wants Borland support?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk