Re: [boost] [fusion] More quanfusion

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-14 22:39:25

Andy Little wrote:
> "Manfred Doudar" wrote
> 
>> Please see my brief reply to Geoffrey Irving; ... and apologies for any
>> apprehension caused, but its my fault - the best name to use really
>> depends on context.
> 
> Then I  guess in fusion you would do :
> 
> fusion::inner_product<SequenceA, SequenceB,Function1,Function2>{...}
> 
> fusion::dot_product<SequenceA, SequenceB>
>    : fusion::inner_product<
>        SequenceA,SequenceB,
>         boost:functional::multiplies,boost::functional::plus
>> {};

Reminds me of fusion and mpl fold/accumulate. It's the same thing with
a different name. fusion and mpl have both as synonyms.

Cheers!
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net