From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-03 12:59:18
> John Maddock wrote:
>> PLease do go ahead, however the error message in the complex_test.cpp
>> case isn't quite right: the test fails because std::sinh and
>> std::cosh are buggy: a very rare event for Dinkumware, but this was
>> tracked down in the same failure on QNX which uses the same std lib
> OK, that increases the scope for failures!
> Do we have a test for the known library versions that fail? That
> might be better than simply testing for Borland, especially if it
> will help out the QNX runners too (should they return)
No I don't know definitively what versions fail, so I guess a test for the
specific version that ships with Borland-5.8.2 will have to do for now?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk