Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a geometry library?

From: Jeremy Pack (rostovpack_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-06 13:36:52

It might be a good idea to dig through the Boost Quaternion classes - they
don't appear to be actively maintained (they're small enough, that it may
not be necessary). If you see functionality missing, it would probably be
better to try and add it rather than rolling a whole new quaternion library.
I'm curious as to which functionality you'd most like to see?

Jeremy Pack

On 3/5/07, Michael Marcin <mmarcin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Yuriy Koblents-Mishke wrote:
> > Hi, Sergey:
> >
> > Did you compare your library with what is available in Boost and
> > Vault?
> >
>
> I've looked around for quite some time and I have yet to see any small
> vector matrix quaternion libraries I like.  The closest is for me is
> tvmet.
>
> I've been holding out for MTL4 but I haven't heard anything about it in a
> while.
>
> - Michael Marcin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>