Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a geometry library?

From: Triger Trader (tiger_trader_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-06 14:01:42

Hi, Jeremy!

>>If you see functionality missing, it would probably be
>>better to try and add it rather than rolling a whole new >>quaternion library.
>>I'm curious as to which functionality you'd most like to see?

Thanks, may be i can extend current solution. But my quaternion class interact with matrix class, otherwise does not make sense place this library into boost.

- Kasak Sergey