Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a geometry library?

From: Jeremy Pack (rostovpack_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-06 14:14:47

If it is geared towards 3D development, it probably ought to provide
conversions to and from the various constructs used for 3D transformations
(things like rotation matrices, Euler angles etc.). Without that, I think it
will just be duplicating functionality already in Boost, just with a
different API.

How hard would it be to make the Boost Quaternion classes work with the
Matrix classes in Ublas?

Jeremy Pack

On 3/6/07, Triger Trader <tiger_trader_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Hi, Jeremy!
>
> >>If you see functionality missing, it would probably be
> >>better to try and add it rather than rolling a whole new >>quaternion
> library.
> >>I'm curious as to which functionality you'd most like to see?
>
> Thanks, may be i can extend current solution. But my quaternion class
> interact with matrix class, otherwise does not make sense place this library
> into boost.
>
> - Kasak Sergey
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>