From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-09 12:22:03
"Arkadiy Vertleyb" <vertleyb_at_[hidden]> wrote
> If BOOST_TYPEOF_NATIVE is defined, BOOST_TYPEOF will work w/o type
> registration through either true native support of the compiler or
> MSVC-specific trick (in which case MSVC_TYPEOF_HACK is also defined).
Hmmm, I just noticed that this is not named correctly. Should be probably
BOOST_TYPEOF_MSVC_HACK. This is not a matter of functionality -- just
compliance to the macro naming rules... Will we have a chance to correct
this in this release?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk