[boost] A question to the release manager (was: [typeof] determining Boost Typeof support)

From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-09 12:22:03

"Arkadiy Vertleyb" <vertleyb_at_[hidden]> wrote

> If BOOST_TYPEOF_NATIVE is defined, BOOST_TYPEOF will work w/o type 
> registration through either true native support of the compiler or 
> MSVC-specific trick (in which case MSVC_TYPEOF_HACK is also defined).

Hmmm, I just noticed that this is not named correctly.  Should be probably 
BOOST_TYPEOF_MSVC_HACK.  This is not a matter of functionality -- just 
compliance to the macro naming rules...  Will we have a chance to correct 
this in this release?

Regards,
Arkadiy