From: Steven Watanabe (steven_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-29 21:59:17
Matthias Schabel <boost <at> schabel-family.org> writes:
> Steven - are you OK with the changes I've committed to the sandbox?
> I'm still not 100% happy with the angle syntax, but it isn't obvious
> to me how to improve it...
You're misusing dimensionless_quantity....
Did you run the tests and examples?
> I'm also a little concerned about the
> runtime optimization issues raised - I'll take a look at the assembly
> generated by gcc. I was particularly surprised by the Intel compiler
> performance. I believe Intel bought the KAI C++ compiler that was
> well known to be extremely good at optimization in the presence of
> template code (in particular expression templates)...
We could try comparing it to a simple wrapper. If
that is slower than double than there is nothing
we can do to improve perfomance.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk