Date: 2007-05-11 08:43:54
> The C++ committee accepted what is essentially Boost.System
> for C++0x.
> See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2241.html
> for the final proposal.
> That proposal is now reflected in the working paper for the
> new standard. See
> The committee made some minor last minute changes. Those
> changes are not yet reflected in Boost.System. The plan is to
> bring Boost.System into compliance with the standard sometime
> in the next month or so.
Nice - but I don't know why posix errors are enumerated now. Maybe some
posix errors are missing (I'm not sure).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk