Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-12 18:11:17

Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden] wrote:
>> The C++ committee accepted what is essentially Boost.System
>> for C++0x.
>> See
>> for the final proposal.
>> That proposal is now reflected in the working paper for the
>> new standard. See
>> The committee made some minor last minute changes. Those
>> changes are not yet reflected in Boost.System. The plan is to
>> bring Boost.System into compliance with the standard sometime
>> in the next month or so.
> Nice - but I don't know why posix errors are enumerated now.

The LWG wanted them to be usable as constants.

> Maybe some
> posix errors are missing (I'm not sure).

Please do an independent check. I have missed something. The POSIX folks
suggested adding a couple of new errors POSIX is in process of adding,
by the way.



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at