Re: [boost] Any libraries now not under the Boost Software License?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-23 12:16:55

Janek Kozicki wrote:
> Whew. That's it. Took me one and a half an hour. Hope this helps.
>
>
> Based on above research I could tell that only boost::ublas doesn't
> have BSL, while all the other files are simply a mistake that can be
> quickly corrected...

Thanks for looking into this: I guess it's too late to tell you that the bcp 
tool can produce a HTML license report in a couple of seconds....!

Looks like we still have a bit of chasing up to do on the license front.

John.