From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-29 03:52:15
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> Hartmut Kaiser skrev:
>> I was waiting for Andy to fix two of the major complaints raised during the
>> review (incompatible license in parts of the code and the generator
>> initialization seed issue), because these would have prevented the
>> acceptance into Boost. As Andy told me, he is almost done with the fixes. As
>> soon as these are finished I'll have a look at the code and will announce
>> the review results.
> What has these to do woth the review results? I mean, normally a library
> is accepted with a bunch of stuff that *must* be fixed before cvs upload.
I think license issues are major obstacles and need to be resolved
completely before any form of acceptance.
IMHO, a library with license issues shouldn't even get accepted for review.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk